Conventionally, “pride” is sometimes understood as an emotion, even within the context of orientational identity. In the June Carnival of Aces call for submissions, one of the prompts attached to the theme asks, “Do you feel proud?” This matches some of the language I heard at one of the TAAAP Pride Chats, where I listened to some of the participants talk about “having” pride or “feeling” pride. That approach doesn’t work for me, as it happens, because my emotions don’t work like that. For me, the meaning I draw from Pride events has to come from somewhere else, which is why I’m turning instead to the role it’s played in LGBTQ advocacy and some lessons I can draw from that — on organizing, on visibility, and on the threat of co-optation.Continue reading
Tag Archives: asexual
Given that everybody makes mistakes, what do we do once we’ve made one? Ideally, we apologize, make things right if we can, and commit to doing better in the future. In other words, everything that didn’t happen after Faith Cheltenham erroneously claimed that BiNet USA owned legal copyright of the bi pride flag, kicking off a chain of baffling missteps that may have permanently damaged the reputation of the entire organization. It’s one thing to spout out nonsense on the internet, but it’s chilling when the person doing so is operating at the helm of an advocacy group and stubbornly doubling down against all legitimate criticism.
This incident was still fresh on my mind when I learned about another, completely separate fiasco unfolding in the ace community: one part ignorance of the past, one part refusal to heed other’s concerns, equal parts unnecessary stress and headaches for everyone.Continue reading
When I picked “leaving” as the theme for the March Carnival of Aces just a few months back, little did I know that March would become a time of not leaving. This month, Siggy has picked the theme of “quarantine,” and I’m taking that as an opportunity to reflect here on the implications of contagious disease for a geographically-scattered community, as well as some potential directions for ace advocacy in the area of health & medical issues.
[Note: This post has been crossposted to Pillowfort.]Continue reading
You may have heard about the anti-allosexual problem in the aro community, so as something of a thought exercise, if there were anti-ace problem, too, how would that manifest? How would it be identified? What kind of form would it take?
Hypothetically. And in case it needs to be said: I do mean these questions seriously.
What would it look like for there to be an anti-ace problem in the aro community? Would it be considered bad form to even ask?Continue reading
A post about the history of QPRs, why people are arguing about it, and how I learned that’s not what they’re actually arguing about at all.
In this post, I’m going to be tackling this topic in three parts:
1) What are people saying? 2) How is that misinformation? 3) How is that a proxy?Continue reading
In the spirit of Queenie’s teeny tiny linkspams, such as the one on greyness, here are a few links about or related to the experiences of tri-orientation aro aces — those identifying as gay/lesbian/bi/het (or some other orientation) while also identifying with both the ace & aro umbrellas.
Some of these links are about identifying with an orientation label in a way that’s not (or not entirely) about romance or sexuality. Some of these links are about nonromantic or ambiguously-romantic partnership. Some of these links are direct personal narratives about tri-label identities, such as gay aro ace or bi aro ace. So as you can see, some of the connections are more direct than others, but hopefully you can find something you’re looking for.
[Crossposted to Pillowfort.]
Bi Aces, Not Biromantic
Tri-Label Aro Aces
Gay/Lesbian/Bi Aro Aces, a comment thread with multiple contributors
A post on being a gay aro ace by Sammy
A post on being a bi aro ace by Astral
Oriented Gray by Coyote
Oriented Aroaceness: An Essay by Lynn
Oriented AroAce Problems (a comic) by Xweetara
Relationships & Partnerships
Updating the Map by Elizabeth
Yearning For “Queerplatonic” To Be Recognized As Not Romantic by luvtheheaven
This post is my submission to the January 2018 Carnival of Aces under the theme of “Identity.” Specifically, this post deals with topics of sexuality, identity, alienation, labeling, doubt, touch, trauma, and abuse.
This impetus for this post is a tumblr post about “being stone vs. being asexual” that Rowan shared with me, after it came up as a recommended post on their dash. There’s maybe a few different things I would question in that post (emphasis on question, since some of it is beyond my depth), but maybe chief among them is how stone sexuality & asexuality are being presented as either/or, i.e. mutually exclusive.
Update: the sequel.
Note: the font I’m using for these is Card Characters from Harold’s Fonts, which is a free download, so feel free to use that to make your own playing card-themed stuff.
for all those folks who post their LGBTQIA posts in the #asexual and #asexuality tags on WordPress — posts that typically have little to nothing to with asexuality specifically, like a post about gay and bisexual representation in novels, or that are about the notion of “queerness” generally, such as advertising your 1-inch pin buttons with the word “queer” in capital letters:
if this is a bid to get more views rather than a failure of the internal logic of your own blog’s tagging categorization system, then should this choice on your part be read to indicate that you fall on the “asexuality is queer” side of the asexuality-and-queerness debate? And if you somehow or another stumbled upon that debate taking place, would you assert that belief or defend the people who do? Would you know what you want to say to allos who police asexual people’s use of “queer” as an identity label and their access to LGBT spaces? And then, if you saw that happening, would you actually say it?
To be clear: I’m not complaining. This is not a problem, but it is an interesting question given that, in the English-speaking part of the asexual community, the portion of the population that calls themselves Christian seems disproportionally lower than the prevalence of Christianity among English-speakers in general. The ace community is very US-centric, even, and the US in particular is known for having a lot of Christians.
So what’s the deal?